The Great George C. Wallace

I received these quotes of George C. Wallace from a Yahoo! group I am a member of:

These are Timeless. Enjoy :o)

Why does the Air Force need expensive new bombers? Have the people
we've been bombing over the years been complaining?
George Wallace

"If any demonstrator ever lays down in front of my car, it'll be the
last car he'll ever lay down in front of"
George Wallace

"I've read about foreign policy and studied - I know the number of
continents (during his 1968 presidential campaign)"
George Wallace

"I am an Alabama Democrat, not a national Democrat. I'm not kin to
those folks. The difference between a national Democrat and an Alabama
Democrat is like the difference between a Communist and a non-Communist."
George Wallace

"And it is a sad day in our country that you cannot walk even in your
neighborhoods at night or even in the daytime because both national
parties, in the last number of years, have kowtowed to every group of
anarchists that have roamed the streets of San Francisco and Los
Angeles and throughout the country. And now they have created
themselves a Frankenstein monster, and the chickens are coming home to
roost all over this country." "Yes, they've looked down their nose at
you and me a long time. They've called us rednecks -- the Republicans
and the Democrats. Well, we're going to show, there sure are a lot of
rednecks in this country."
George Wallace

"I don't hate blacks. The day I said `segregation forever,' I never
said a thing that would upset a black person unless it was
segregation. I never made fun of `em about inequality and all that
kind of stuff. But my vehemence was against the federal government
folks. I didn't make people get mad against black people. I made `em
get mad against the courts."
George Wallace

To hippies who said he was a Nazi, he replied, "I was killing
fascists when you punks were in diapers." To other hippies, he said,
"You shout four letter words at me, well, I have two for you: S-O-A-P
and W-O-R-K."

Campaign website

Okay everyone, here is the site http://WhitakerForGovernor2006.com
Carl is a fine gentleman and not one of the common "politicians" nor lock-step Republicans. He is a statesman and will work for the best of our State of Tennessee, rather than benefit his friends, family and self, as Phil Bredesen so graciously has.

It is time to change Tennessee, to rid our State of the Federalist systems that are bankrupting our state and encouraging entitlement, people dependent upon the systems, who, becoming so used to the "easy hand-outs" that they are not willing to contribute to the economy and work. Also, we need to get serious about our illegal immigrant problem, to punish employers who use illegals, and also to just send them back to where they came from, no questions.
I do know that a State Sales Tax will be out of the question with Carl Whitaker, I cannot say the same for our current governor, Phil Bredesen, no matter what he 'says', I cannot trust a liar.

So please, check out the campaign website: http://WhitakerForGovernor2006.com and see if there is any way you might be able to help.
God bless.
For God and the Confederacy,
Landon Cahow ><

Carl Whitaker for Tennessee Governor 2006

Hello readers, I just met a gentleman this past weekend whom I spoke extensively with on the phone, who is running for Governor of Tennessee this next election year. His name is Carl Two Feathers Whitaker. He ran in the last gubernatorial race back in 2002 against Phil Bredesen (our current governor) and Van Hillary, coming in at a noteworthy fourth, which is pretty good in this state seeing that he ran as an independent. This year he is going to try to take the Republican, as unpopular a choice that may be to many Southerners and Confederates. But I endorse him in this move as it is a sure way to have a very good run at it. Our current Democrat Governor has seen his ratings plummet since his unfair dealings with people on TennCare and a recent potential misuse of power benefiting friends/fellow government officials. I hear there may be more to the famed "Tennessee Waltz" that we have yet to learn about, but we will see if there is not more to come out of that. Needless to say this is not showing good for Democrats and could work in favor of a primary Republican Candidate. I am going to be posting more on this in the future, to keep everyone up to date, also I am doing the campaign website for Mr. Whitaker and will post that here as soon as it is complete.

For God and the Confederacy,
Landon Cahow ><

Was it really about Slavery?

I was reading some more good Confederate literature, from the book "The Real Lincoln" by Thomas J. DiLorenzo and an interesting point was made that I wish every American would consider. The fact that the Republican Party of 1860 ran not on the Abolition of Slavery, but rather on the platform of a larger, more centralized Federal Government. Lincoln stated clearly in his inaugural address:

"I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."

Also, Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune and a staunch Republican stated the Republican Party's stance as follows:

"All the unoccupied territory......shall be preserved for the benefit of the white Caucasian race -- a thing which cannot be except by the exclusion of slavery."

With that understood I make this point: Although it may be that the deep South states might have seceded from the union because of slavery, the upper South States; Arkansas, Tennessee, North Carolina, Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri -- did not. They remained loyal to the union and only seceded after the war-hungry Lincoln declared war on their Southern neighbors. It would seem that Lincoln did not have a problem with these slave states remaining in the union, and they may very likly have remained there if the Federal Government had not overstepped it's Constitutional bounds. One will very well have to question the motive of Lincoln and his followers for blatantly, and unprovoked, attacking the South, if in this example we see that it was not about slavery.

Think about this, if the South did not wish the Federal Government to dictate what they were to do with their slaves, what other things would the Northern States not have wanted Lincoln to dictate upon them?

For God and the Confederacy,
Landon Cahow ><